The “male effect” and the “male-to-male effect” allow sustainable control of goat reproduction.

Authors

  • José Alberto Delgadillo Sánchez Centro de Investigación en Reproducción Caprina
  • Philippe Chemineau Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, CNRS, IFCE, INRAE, Université de Tours, 37380 Nouzilly, France https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1584-7285
  • José Alfonso Abecia Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Ambientales (IUCA), Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza 50013, España https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2827-3054
  • Dolores López-Magaña Centro de Investigación en Reproducción Caprina (CIRCA), Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, 27054 Torreón, Coahuila, México
  • Horacio Hernández Centro de Investigación en Reproducción Caprina (CIRCA), Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, 27054 Torreón, Coahuila, México https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0569-8888
  • Natalia López-Magaña Centro de Investigación en Reproducción Caprina (CIRCA), Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, 27054 Torreón, Coahuila, México. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila 27000, Torreón, Coahuila, México https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7913-8704

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59741/agri.v3iNE.24

Keywords:

Reproductive seasonality, Photoperiod, Male effect, Male-to-male effect.

Abstract

Photoperiod is the main environmental factor that synchronizes the reproductive seasonality of goats. For this reason, photoperiodic treatments are used to stimulate the sexual activity in males and females during the months of the seasonal sexual rest. However, sociosexual interactions between females and males can also be used to induce the sexual activity during the resting months. Thus, bucks rendered sexually hyperactive by exposure to photoperiodic treatments are more efficient than hypoactive bucks in stimulating the reproductive activity of females during seasonal anestrus, through the phenomena called “short-term male effect” and the recently described “long-term male effect.”. Furthermore, the permanent presence of sexually hyperactive bucks prevents the seasonal anovulation, and goats ovulate all year round. Moreover, sexually hyperactive bucks are also more efficient than hypoactive bucks in stimulating the endocrine and reproductive activity of bucks during seasonal sexual rest. We recently called this phenomenon the “buck-to-buck effect”. In conclusion, sociosexual interactions allow sustainable control of the reproduction of the female and male goats.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abecia J.A., Chemineau P., Flores J.A., Keller M., Duarte G., Forcada F. and J.A. Delgadillo. 2015. Continuous exposure to sexually active rams extends estrous activity in ewes in spring. Theriogenology. 84 (9): 1549-1555. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.08.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.08.002

Abecia J.A., Keller M., Palacios C., Chemineau P. and J.A. Delgadillo. 2019. Light-induced sexually active rams prevent the seasonal inhibition of luteinizing-hormone in ovariectomized estradiol-implanted ewes. Theriogenology. 15 (136): 43-46. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.06.032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.06.032

Abecia J.A., Canto F., Keller M., Palacios C., Chemineau P. and J.A. Delgadillo. 2022. Exposure of rams in sexual rest to sexually activated males in spring increases plasma LH and testosterone concentrations. Theriogenology. 15 (192):116-121. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2022.08.035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2022.08.035

Bedos M., Portillo W., Dubois J.P., Duarte G., Flores J.A., Chemineau P., Keller M., Paredes R.G. and J.A. Delgadillo. 2016. A high level of male sexual activity is necessary for the activation of the medial preoptic area and the arcuate nucleus during the “male effect” in anestrous goats. Physiology and Behavior. 165: 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.07.018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.07.018

Chasles M., Chesneau D., Moussu C., Delgadillo J.A., Chemineau P. and M. Keller. 2016. Sexually active bucks are efficient to stimulate female ovulatory activity during the anestrous season also under temperate latitudes. Animal Reproduction Science. 168: 86–91. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.10.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.02.030

Chemineau P. 1987. Posibilities for using bucks to stimulate ovarian and oestrus cycles in anovulatory goats. A review. Livestock Production Science. 17: 135-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(87)90059-5

Delgadillo J.A., Flores J.A., Véliz F.G., Hernández H.F., Duarte G., Vielma J., Poindron P., Chemineau P. and B. Malpaux. 2002. Induction of sexual activity in lactating anovulatory female goats using male goats treated only with artificially long days. Journal of Animal Science. 80: 2780–27866. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.80112780x

Delgadillo J.A. 2011. Environmental and social cues can be used in combination to develop sustainable breeding techniques for goat reproduction in the subtropics. Animal. 5: 74–81. doi:10.1017/S1751731110001400 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731110001400

Delgadillo J.A., Flores J.A., Hernández H., Poindron P., Keller M., Fitz-Rodríguez G., Duarte G., Vielma J., Fernández I.G. and P. Chemineau. 2015. Sexually active males prevent the display of seasonal anestrus in female goats. Hormones and Behavior. 69: 8-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.12.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.12.001

Delgadillo J.A., Espinoza-Flores L.A., Abecia J.A., Hernández H., Keller M. and P. Chemineau. 2022. Sexually active male goats stimulate the endocrine and sexual activities of other males in seasonal sexual rest through the “buck-to-buck effect”. Domestic Animal Endocrinology. 81: 106746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2022.106746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2022.106746

Muñoz A.L., Chesneau D., Hernández H., Bedos M., Duarte G., Vielma J., Zarazaga L.A., Chemineau P., Keller M. and J.A. Delgadillo. 2017. Sexually active bucks counterbalance the seasonal negative feedback of estradiol on LH in ovariectomized goats. Domestic Animal Endocrinology. 60: 42–49.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2017.03.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2017.03.004

Restall B.J. 1992. Seasonal variation in reproductive activity in australian goats. Animal Reproduction Science. 27: 305-318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(92)90145-4

Shelton M. 1960. Influence of the presence of a male goat on the initiation of estrous cycling and ovulation of Angora does. Journal of Animal Science. 19: 368–375. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1960.192368x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1960.192368x

Walkden-Brown S.W., Martin G.B. and B.J. Restall. 1999. Role of male-female interaction in regulating reproduction in sheep and goats. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 52: 243-257.

Zarazaga L.A., Gatica M.C., Hernández H., Gallego-Calvo L., Delgadillo J.A. and J.L. Guzmán. 2017. The isolation of females from males to promote a later male effect is unnecessary if the bucks used are sexually active. Theriogenology. 95: 42-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.02.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.02.023

Downloads

Published

2024-09-02

How to Cite

The “male effect” and the “male-to-male effect” allow sustainable control of goat reproduction. (2024). Universitas Agri, 3(NE1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.59741/agri.v3iNE.24

PLUM Metrics